Archive for category Teaching & Learning
dialectica Essay Prize – Cognitive Penetration
Posted by Lisa Evans in Journal Club, Research, Teaching & Learning on May 3, 2012
The dialectica 2012 essay prize topic has been announced! Submit your article on the topic of Cognitive Penetration before November 1st for your chance to win £1,500!
Cognitive penetration refers to the influence of beliefs, expectations, moods, desires or background theories on the content of perceptual processes or conscious experiences. This phenomenon has been in the forefront of the philosophy of science, the philosophy of perception, and the foundations of cognitive science. Philosophers of science have warned that cognitive penetration might threaten the epistemic role of perception as an objective source of knowledge and have used it to explain radical paradigm shifts. Philosophers of perception have tried to characterize the various ways in which perceptual processes or conscious experiences can be altered by other mental states or activities. Cognitive scientists have exploited this phenomenon as a starting point to motivate claims on the architecture of the human mind, including modularity and plasticity.
We invite submissions on any aspect of this phenomenon. Possible questions include: How is the influence of various mental states on perceptual processes or experiences to be characterized in psychological terms? Are there principled differences between the cognitive penetration of conscious experiences and that of subpersonal perceptual processes? What is the impact (if any) of cognitive penetration on the individuation of mental states? What kinds of cognitive penetration are there? Does cognitive penetration lend support to relativism? How does cognitive penetration relate to the confirmation of scientific theories by experience? Does cognitive penetration undermine (or support) some models of perceptual justification? Does the use of instruments to observe phenomena presuppose any form of cognitive penetration? What sorts of evidence can support or disconfirm claims about cognitive penetration? Could it shed new light on Kuhnian incommensurability?
Please send your submissions in pdf format to Philipp Keller, philipp.keller@unige.ch, by the 1st of November 2012. The author of the winning entry will receive £1500. All papers submitted will be considered submissions to the journal and should not be published or under review elsewhere.
Virtual Issue on Genetics
Posted by Liam Cooper (Managing Editor) in Research, Teaching & Learning on April 23, 2012
This special online issue of the Hastings Center Report brings together disparate discussions of the ethical issues posed by genetic science. In early issues of the Report, in the 1970s, discussions of genetics often sought partly just imply to identify and organize the issues- and to argue, in effect, that this was a topic that bioethics should address. Since then, the discussion has turned to more narrowly drawn issues. In this issue, for example, a set of six essays addresses the prospect that genetic information will lead to an era of “personalized medicine, ” with implications not only for medical treatment but also for cost of care, biobanking, privacy, and access to information, among other things. In the lead article, legal scholar Mark Rothstein considers whether health policy should address genetic information separately from other kinds of medical information, and in an editorial on Rothstein founded in the column titled Another Voice, British philosopher Neil Manson explains why treating genetic information separately seems so attractive. A special supplement to this issue, by Hastings scholar Erik Parens, explores the ramifications of behavioral genetics, and other items branch off in still other directions, including (genuinely going afield here) into the prospect that genetic and other sciences might allow human beings to transcend the human condition. The items selected for this issue emphasize more recent scholarship and commentary, but were otherwise chosen precisely to capture as much as possible of the range of material that has appeared in the Report on this topic.
Click here to read the virtual issue.
Journal of Applied Philosophy 2011 Article Prize Winner
Posted by Lisa Evans in Journal Club, Research, Teaching & Learning on March 22, 2012
The editors of the Journal of Applied Philosophy are pleased to announce the winner of the 2011 annual article prize. Congratulations to Jakob Elster who was awarded the £1000 prize for his article How Outlandish Can Imaginary Cases Be?
The Journal of Applied Philosophy will continue to award an annual prize of £1000 to the best article published in the year’s volume. The judgement as to the best article will be made by the editors of the journal; the Society for Applied Philosophy annual lecture, published in the journal, will not be eligible for the prize of best article.
New Naturalistic Philosophy Editor for Philosophy Compass
Posted by Liam Cooper (Managing Editor) in Event, Teaching & Learning, Viewpoint on March 15, 2012
We’re delighted to announce the appointment of the new editor of the Naturalistic Philosophy section of Philosophy Compass, Edouard Machery.
Edouard is Associate Professor in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, a Fellow of the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, and a member of the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (Pittsburgh-CMU). His research focuses on the philosophical issues raised by psychology and cognitive neuroscience with a special interest in concepts, moral psychology, the relevance of evolutionary biology for understanding cognition, modularity, the nature, origins, and ethical significance of prejudiced cognition, and the methods of psychology and cognitive neuroscience. He has published more than 60 articles and chapters on these topics in venues such as Analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Cognition, Mind & Language, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, and Philosophy of Science. He is the author of Doing without Concepts (OUP, 2009), and he has been an associate editor of The European Journal for Philosophy of Science since 2009. He is also involved in the development of experimental philosophy, having published several noted articles in this field.
New Philosophy Compass Issue, Sept 2011
Posted by Liam Cooper (Managing Editor) in Research, Teaching & Learning, Viewpoint on September 14, 2011

.
The latest issue of Philosophy Compass is available on Wiley Online Library
.
.
.
Aesthetics & Philosophy of Art
Aesthetics of Opera (pages 575–584)
Paul Thom
Continental
Schelling’s Contemporary Resurgence: The Dawn after the Night When All Cows Were Black (pages 585–598)
Jason Wirth
Legal & Political
Emotions and the Criminal Law (pages 599–610)
Mihaela Mihai
Logic & Language
Generalized Quantifiers and Number Sense (pages 611–621)
Robin Clark
Negation, Denial, and Rejection (pages 622–629)
David Ripley
Naturalistic Philosophy
Empirical Arguments for Group Minds: A Critical Appraisal (pages 630–639)
Robert D. Rupert
Philosophy of Science
Introduction to the Philosophy of Statistical Mechanics: Can Probability Explain the Arrow of Time in the Second Law of Thermodynamics? (pages 640–651)
Orly Shenker and Meir Hemmo
Interview: Accounting Ethics
Posted by Liam Cooper (Managing Editor) in Interview, Teaching & Learning on September 8, 2011
We recently had a chance to chat with Ronald Duska who recently retired from The American College. Ron is currently an adjunct at the American College, as well as an adjunct at St. Joseph’s University, and principal of Duska Business Ethics Consulting. Along with Brenda Shay Duska (Del Pizzo & Associates, USA) and Julie Anne Ragatz (The American College Center for Ethics in Financial Services, USA), Ron is author of Accounting Ethics, recently published in a second edition. The book deals with, among other things, the recent financial crises, the nature of corruption and greed, and the responsibility that accountants should feel for the general public. Given the financial meltdown of 2008, and the new challenges to GAAP from IFERS and Mark to Market accounting, a new edition, that went beyond the concerns created by the Enron and Arthur Anderson collapse and the passage of Sarbanes/Oxley, of the early years of the millennium, seemed essential.
Philosopher’s Eye: Why did you decide to write Accounting Ethics?
Ron Duska: It was in response to a request of the series editors, particularly Michael Hoffman who, knowing my interest in business ethics and the fact that my wife was a CPA, thought it might be a project of interest to me.
PE: What’s the central concern of the book, and why is it important?
RD: The central concern of the book is to analyse what the societal purpose of accounting is Read the rest of this entry »
Scholarly Content on the Impact of 9/11
Posted by Liam Cooper (Managing Editor) in Research, Teaching & Learning, Viewpoint on September 5, 2011
In the 10 years since the events of September 2001 a vast amount of scholarly research has been written on the impact of 9/11. Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to share with you this collection of free book and journal content, featuring over 20 book chapters and 185 journal articles from over 200 publications, spanning subjects across the social sciences and humanities.
Simply click on your area of interest below to access this reading and learning resource today:
| Accounting & Finance | Law
Literature, Language & Linguistics |
New Philosophy Compass Issue, August 2011
Posted by Liam Cooper (Managing Editor) in Research, Teaching & Learning on September 1, 2011
The latest issue of Philosophy Compass is now available on Wiley Online Library
| Aesthetics & Philosophy of Art | ||||
|
||||
| Logic & Language | ||||
|
||||
| Naturalistic Philosophy | ||||
|
||||
| Philosophy of Religion | ||||
|
||||
| Teaching & Learning Guide | ||||
|







